0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì¼÷¾Æ¿Í Á¤»ó¾ÆÀÇ ¿µÀ¯¾Æ±â ¼ºÀå¹ß´Þ»óÅ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

A Comparative Study on the Growth £¦ Developmental Status of Premature and Full Term Infants During the First 3Years

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 1985³â 15±Ç 3È£ p.62 ~ 73
KMID : 0806119850150030062
¹Ú¿µ¾Ö (  ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø

Abstract

The problems of growth & development due to maladjustment are gradually increasing while need for the treatment of children¡¯s diseases is decreasing. The level of developmental deficiency or delay correlates with neonatal birth weight and also with gestational age, i.e. degrees of prematurity. There-fore, developmental defects and potential risk factors¡¯ are more Common in premature infants than in full term infants. The purpose of this study is to define the difference in the growth at developmental status between premature and full term infants, and to define the relation between the developmental status and the physical growth during the first 3 years¡¯ Data were collected from January 10, 1985 to April 6, 1985 at 3 hospitals including St. Mary¡¯s Hospital, and through home visiting. The subjects of this study consisted of 79 Premature infants (G.A. <37wks. & B.W. <2.5kg) and 94 full term infants (G.A.¡Ã37 wks. & B.W.¡Ã2.5kg). The study method used was a questionnaire, anthropometric assessment and DDST for normative data of growth & development. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test and t-test. The results of the study were as follows: Hypothesis: 1 : That the prematures will differ from the full term infants in the physical growth status during the first 3 years was partially supported (p£¼0.02) : The prematures reached up the full term infants in the physical growth status in the first 6 months. And, the first hypothesis was supported (P<0.01) : There are more cases which is below¡®the Korean children¡¯s physical. growth standards¡¯in prematures than in full term infants. Hypothesis 2 : That the prematures will differ from the full term infants in the developmental status during the first 3 years was supported (P< 0.001)£»¡®Normal¡¯developmental status due to DDST was less in prematures than in full term infants. And, the second hypothesis was Partially supported (P<0.02) : The developmental status of the pre-matures was different from that of the full term infants within the first 3 months by analysis of passed items in DDST, Hypothesis 3 : That the prematures¡¯ developmental status will relate to their physical growth during the first 3 years was supported (P<0.001) : If the prematures¡¯ developmental status is in delayed status, then, their physical growth status is also in delayed status. This study shows that the prematures differed significantly from the full term infants in the growth at developmental status during their infancy. This means that the nurse can foster the growth & development of the prematures by supportive care during their infancy. Further longitudinal study is needed to verify these findings for the environmental factors.
KeyWords

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed